Gun Rights Legislative Alert – H. 3292 Anti-Gun Rights in South Carolina

Gun Rights Legislative Alert – H. 3292 Anti-Gun Rights in South Carolina

Anti-gun legislation (gun control) is being considered in South Carolina.

H. 3292 will be on the agenda of the full House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Jan 24 at 2:30 pm.

H. 3292 WAS the pro gun constitutional carry bill introduced by Rep. Mike Pitts. BUT, Rep. Thad Viers – the chair of the General Laws subcommittee – gutted the pro gun bill and substituted his Viers amendment. The Viers amendment replaced the Mike Pitts language with unconstitutional gun control. You can read all about the Viers amendment on the GrassRoots web site at www.SCFirearms.org GrassRoots has been prohibited by the court from updating the web site since last April, but the info is still accurate. See our post “What Happened to Grassroots” to the right hand side of our web site. We are acting because Grassroots has been silenced.

Unfortunately, due to the ongoing lawsuit and court restraining order against GrassRoots, GrassRoots can NOT appear at the meeting or contact any politicians explaining how the unconstitutional anti gun Viers amendment needs to be voted down and the GrassRoots proposed amendments to the original H. 3292 be adopted and passed instead. All of this can be found on the GrassRoots web site. . . .

Read more here on the anti-gun rights legislation.

If anyone reading this would like to comment and update us as to what did happen on the vote, please do. Thanks so much.

Pro-Gun Conservatives Will Challenge Utah Senator Orrin Hatch

Pro-Gun Conservatives Will Challenge Utah Senator Orrin Hatch

GunOwners of America announced that Orrin Hatch, not a friend of gun owners and gun rights, will be challenged by gun rights conservatives in the upcoming election. Read the following to see how many times Orrin Hatch has supported gun control. I’m glad he will be challenged.

Gun Owners of America
Orrin Hatch Picks Up Two Pro-gun Challengers;
Welcome News for Gun Owners

Two pro-gun conservatives recently announced they were running against Utah Senator Orrin Hatch.

This is welcome news for gun owners. In a Senate career that has lasted more than thirty five years, Hatch has not been a particularly good friend of the Second Amendment.

During negotiations over the 1986 McClure-Volkmer Firearms Owners Protection Act — designed to protect gun owners from abuses of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms — Hatch sat at the negotiating table next to officials of the ATF and argued against the pro-gun positions of Sen. Jim McClure.

Though a senior member of the Senate, Hatch did nothing to block camels-nose legislation slammed through by Republican leader Bob Dole in the late 1980s to regulate armor-piercing bullets and outlaw non-existent “plastic guns.”

As ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1993-4, Hatch refused to filibuster the Brady Law, even though it would have been possible to kill it.

He supported the 1996 Lautenberg amendment to impose a lifetime gun ban on people guilty of “domestic misdemeanors” – a term so amorphous that it could apply to spanking your kid or engaging in a verbal argument.

In the wake of the Columbine shooting, Hatch voted for amendments which would have effectively banned gun shows, made it more difficult to keep a loaded gun in your home for self-defense, and codified the Bush-era semi-auto import ban.

This package of legislation was stopped in a conference committee only after Hatch and others were pummeled relentlessly by tens of thousands of GOA activists.

In 2007, Hatch supported the Veterans Disarmament Act—which could strip the Second Amendment rights of honorably discharged veterans who seek professional counseling following traumatic wartime experiences.

Over the following two years, while GOA was working with pro-gun Senators to repeal the gun ban in national parks, Hatch voted against repeal before voting for it in 2009.

Last year, Hatch opposed an amendment offered by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) to exempt gun buyer information from the Obama administration’s virtually unlimited ability to seize “business records” under the reauthorization of post-9/11 legislation.

Sen. Hatch hasn’t exactly stood up to the Obama administration, either. He voted in favor of regulatory “czar” Cass Sunstein, who favors a ban on hunting and who would grant animals legal protections in court.

And, despite repeated pleas from GOA members, he voted to confirm Eric Holder as Attorney General. In addition to being mired in the Fast and Furious scandal, Holder was the point man on gun control for President Bill Clinton and is a vocal supporter of banning many semiautomatic firearms.

Thankfully, Orrin Hatch is facing a serious challenge in this year’s Republican convention.

Former State Senator Dan Liljenquist is a stalwart pro-gun conservative who understands the dangers of compromising with the likes of President Obama.

And State Rep. Chris Herrod also jumped in the race because, he said, “we don’t have much time to fix our challenges” as a nation. Both Herrod and Liljenquist are “A” rated on gun rights issues.

The candidates will face off in the state Republican convention in April. If no candidate receives more than 60 percent of the delegate votes, the top two vote-getters will run in a June primary.

Gun Owners of America welcomes the challenge to a Senator with a long history of compromising on Second Amendment rights.

Read more and get involved at GunOwners of America.

Romney & Huntsman – No Response to GunOwners of America Candidate Questionnaire

Romney & Huntsman – No Response to GunOwners of America Candidate Questionnaire

What follows is part of a GunOwners of America Action Alert, or News Alert, that they send out from time to time. Very helpful for staying informed regarding a candidate’s position on gun rights and gun control. It is a fair indication, not perfect, of course, about what they will do if elected President.

Personally, I don’t know how Romney won in the Iowa caucuses with so many gun owners in that state.

Romney, Huntsman Stonewall Gun Owners

As New Hampshire voters get set to head to the polls, Mitt and Jon Huntsman continue to ignore requests from gun owners that he return the GOA candidate questionnaire.

Thank to your efforts, we’ve heard from most of the Republican candidates, including Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul. But Romney and Huntsman continue to turn a deaf ear to the Second Amendment community.

Romney’s stonewalling is no surprise. After all, he is on record supporting a semi-auto ban and waiting periods for gun purchases. Still, he has the audacity to travel around the country claiming to be a supporter of the Second Amendment.

If he truly has “changed his spots,” then why not commit in writing to support specific Second Amendment issues? . . .

Read more about Romney and Huntsman at Gunowners of America.

Gun Control Is Dead? Well, Not Exactly . . . Bloomberg Businessweek

Gun Control Is Dead? Well, Not Exactly . . . Bloomberg Businessweek

The headline of Bloomberg’s article gives it away.

Gun Control: A Movement Without Followers
More Americans favor Second Amendment rights, and lower murder rates in big cities convince some that tough laws are unnecessary

The evidence for the weakening of Gun Control is cited as:

In the year since the Tucson (Ariz.) massacre, in which a Glock-wielding gunman killed six people and wounded 13, the most famous victim, Gabrielle Giffords, has recovered admirably. The Arizona representative has co-authored a memoir and made appearances in the well of the House of Representatives and on national television. What Giffords and her fellow Democrats have not done is use the Tucson bloodshed to achieve tougher gun control laws.

The inaction, especially President Barack Obama’s passivity on the topic, demonstrates that gun control has expired as a national political issue. If Democrats can’t sell stiffer restrictions after a midday attack on a congresswoman, when can they? . . .

I would agree. Folks are beginning to understand that supporters of the Second Amendment are law-abiding and aren’t the ones committing violent crimes against their fellow citizens.

Read more on Gun Control is Dead here.

GunOwners Need to Be Responsible – Keep Guns Away From Criminals – How?

GunOwners Need to Be Responsible – Keep Guns Away From Criminals – How?

Article describes how a policeman’s safe, with his guns inside, was stolen. He reminds us why gunowners need to take precautions with our guns and keep them out of the criminal’s hands. Criminals arm themselves by stealing guns, so read up and see what you can do about it. Good read.

In December, 1997, I was visiting family in California. My thoughts at the time were reserved for the imminent birth of my second child and thus far away from my Puget Sound area home that was being blanketed with record snowfall.

Unfortunately, the snow that accumulated in my driveway for a week proved a tempting target for two roving meth addicts looking for empty houses. The tweakers loaded up their vehicle (and my car), and took everything. With apologies to Dr. Seuss, the twitchy grinches took more than just pop-guns and pantookas – the burglars found my gun safe, pulled it out of the wall, and made off with my department issued handgun and rifle.

That is the story of how I joined the legion of gun owners who accidentally armed the criminal element. . . .

Read more on how and why gunowners need to keep guns away from criminals.

GunOwners of America – 2012 Presidential Candidates – Ron Paul A+ ; Rick Perry A ; Michelle Bachmann A; Rick Santorum B- ; Newt Gingrich C ; Mitt Romney D-

GunOwners of America – 2012 Presidential Candidates – Ron Paul A+ ; Rick Perry A ; Michelle Bachmann A; Rick Santorum B- ; Newt Gingrich C ; Mitt Romney D-

Is the media really reporting where the GOP Presidential candidates stand on gun rights and gun control? I do not think so. I have heard very little said about Gingrich or Romney on gun rights. Come on folks, comment on this and get the news out.

Read more about the GOP 2012 Presidential Candidates and their gun rights’ records at GunOwners of America here.

Armed Mother Uses Her Lawfully-Owned Gun To Defend Her Son and Shoot His Attacker

Armed Mother Uses Her Lawfully-Owned Gun To Defend Her Son and Shoot His Attacker

This is why women should be armed and dangerous, to defend themselves and their loved ones, if necessary, from evil people. Who knows what might have happened to her son (he had been shot once by his attacker) if this mother wouldn’t have had a gun to defend him? Amazing. Gun Control would have disarmed her, not the criminal who robbed her son and then shot him. Gun Rights allowed her to have her gun and defend her son, and finally, putting an unfortunate end to this criminal’s life.

If you were a robber and thought someone was armed, you know it would deter you some. But, if you thought, everyone is disarmed, then you are less fearful of the consequences.

Gun rights works. Gun control doesn’t.

A Philadelphia man was shot dead Tuesday night after he made the mistake of trying to rob a man who had a pistol packin’ mama nearby, police say.

A 23-year-old man was in the stairwell of his East Oak Lane apartment building with his girlfriend at about 9 p.m. when a 19-year-old man walked up to them, pistol-whipped the man and shot him in the leg while trying to rob him, according to police. . . .

Read more here.

Gun Ban – Casper Wyoming City Council Passes New Ordinance Banning Guns In Public City Government Meetings

Gun Ban – Casper Wyoming City Council Passes New Ordinance Banning Guns In Public City Government Meetings

Anti-gunners and gun control advocates will be happy with this decision. But, the legal, law-abiding gun owners object to the new ordinance, and they plan to challenge it. Why are the gun right groups going to challenge the ordinance? Because gun control doesn’t work.

And, if a doctor or lawyer, or a businessman attends a city council meeting, and maybe there is another community member there who is upset with something that was said or done, will the doctor, or lawyer, or businessman be guaranteed their safety if they are disarmed while attending the meeting? Great questions to ponder.

Everyone will have to hang their guns at the door before entering the Casper City Council chambers under a new ordinance passed last week.

In a five-to-four vote, the council approved a controversial measure that prohibits bringing a firearm or other deadly weapon into any public city government meeting.

The law drew the ire of a number of gun rights and constitutional groups, and is expected to be challenged in the state legislature and also the courts. . . .

Do gun bans work? No, so why do they want this at the city council meetings?

. . . “The second question is, ‘Do gun bans work?’” Begeron went on to ask. “The answer is no, and I have about six cases of facts and statistics and evidence that guns bans not only don’t work, but … many times have a negative impact on crime.” . . .

Read more of the Casper Journal storyhere.